Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 5:02:56 GMT
Electoral strategies never cease to surprise me on both sides. Less than a week before the call to the polls, at a campaign rally held with representatives of the Association of Victims of Terrorism, Pablo Casado promised to give relevance to this association so that its opinion negatively influences the prison benefits to which they aspire. ETA prisoners. For his part, Enrique López, Minister of the Interior, Justice and Victims of Terrorism of the Madrid government, said at the same event that "Rufián and Otegi would not vote for Ayuso, but for Gabilondo, Iglesias or Mónica." And of course, one who is not made of stone is surprised and questions how unnecessary it is to resurrect ETA now, especially when the polls give the PP a sure winner.
What is the point of this populist allegation of taking ETA out for a ride as was already done on the eve of the elections after the Atocha attack? Why highlight the unnecessary obviousness that Rufián and Otegui would never vote for Ayuso (and yes for Gabilondo, Iglesias or Mónica), since Belgium Mobile Number List they are not registered in Madrid and even more so because they are both left-wing? Let's be sensible and play fair please. All without exception. In electoral campaigns, unnecessary, eccentric and extemporaneous arguments are often used, but using ETA terrorism and the consequent pain that these murderers inflicted is a totally dispensable cruelty given that the terrorist group was defeated ten years ago.
I understand that the PP feels the need to use Bildu as compensation for its collusion with VOX, a party that, whether we like it or not, is as legitimate as Bildu (with whom I have no affinities or sympathies), despite more than a few are stained with the blood of past victims, and others use fascist tactics and promote contempt for the human rights of certain groups. I also do not understand what the AVT was painting yesterday in an electoral event that had nothing to do with the objectives of this association, nor do I find any sense in Casado's promise to offer them a voice to oppose a penitentiary law that emanates from constitutional principles. and makes it clear that inmates must serve their sentences close to their homes or those of their families (regardless of whether or not the writer of this article is in favor of making the imprisonment of murderers comfortable). These benefits are decided by judges, penitentiary institutions and not a victims' association, especially because if this were the case, one could act under the influence of compensation and revenge.
What is the point of this populist allegation of taking ETA out for a ride as was already done on the eve of the elections after the Atocha attack? Why highlight the unnecessary obviousness that Rufián and Otegui would never vote for Ayuso (and yes for Gabilondo, Iglesias or Mónica), since Belgium Mobile Number List they are not registered in Madrid and even more so because they are both left-wing? Let's be sensible and play fair please. All without exception. In electoral campaigns, unnecessary, eccentric and extemporaneous arguments are often used, but using ETA terrorism and the consequent pain that these murderers inflicted is a totally dispensable cruelty given that the terrorist group was defeated ten years ago.
I understand that the PP feels the need to use Bildu as compensation for its collusion with VOX, a party that, whether we like it or not, is as legitimate as Bildu (with whom I have no affinities or sympathies), despite more than a few are stained with the blood of past victims, and others use fascist tactics and promote contempt for the human rights of certain groups. I also do not understand what the AVT was painting yesterday in an electoral event that had nothing to do with the objectives of this association, nor do I find any sense in Casado's promise to offer them a voice to oppose a penitentiary law that emanates from constitutional principles. and makes it clear that inmates must serve their sentences close to their homes or those of their families (regardless of whether or not the writer of this article is in favor of making the imprisonment of murderers comfortable). These benefits are decided by judges, penitentiary institutions and not a victims' association, especially because if this were the case, one could act under the influence of compensation and revenge.
